Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Detection methods for optimal target reflectivity estimation with two-mode squeezed vacuum probes
arXiv
Authors: Harel Radia, Tuvia Gefen, Nadav Katz
Year
2026
Paper ID
72438
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
154
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Target reflectivity estimation using a two-mode squeezed vacuum (TMSV) probe offers a theoretical advantage over classical schemes, but realizing this potential under the measurement constraints of microwave platforms remains a central challenge. In this work, we study the precision limits for target reflectivity estimation across different energy and loss regimes, while accounting for realistic measurement restrictions. We characterize the optimal measurements and identify a transition in their structure: above a specific reflectivity threshold, a parametric amplifier receiver is optimal, whereas below it, the optimal observables are two-mode squeezing generators. We then study the performance of Gaussian measurements. When restricted to standard local homodyne detection, the TMSV probe is highly non-optimal. However, we show that suitable non-local Gaussian measurements can closely approach the quantum Cramér-Rao bound at the large noise limit. These results demonstrate that near-optimal quantum target reflectivity estimation is achievable in various relevant noisy regimes, even under the restriction of Gaussian measurements.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Target reflectivity estimation using a two-mode squeezed vacuum (TMSV) probe offers a theoretical advantage over classical schemes, but realizing this potential under the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.