Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
Security of Quantum Conference Key Agreement with Two-Way Classical Communication
arXiv
Authors: Shun Kawakami, Mori Watanabe, Takuya Ikuta, Koichi Takasugi
Year
2026
Paper ID
72424
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
170
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum conference key agreement (QCKA) enables multiple users to establish a common secret key with information-theoretic security and is regarded as a key primitive for secure communication in future quantum networks. However, practical implementations of QCKA typically suffer from higher noise levels than conventional bipartite quantum key distribution (QKD), making the improvement of the tolerable error threshold an important challenge. Gottesman and Lo proposed two preprocessing procedures for QKD with two-way classical communication, known as the B-step and the P-step, which enhance the tolerable error threshold. In this paper, we analyze the asymptotic security of QCKA with tripartite GHZ states and two measurement bases using two-way classical communication, including multiple B-steps and P-steps. We derive the corresponding secure key rate analytically and demonstrate that iterative B-steps can increase the tolerable error threshold beyond 20%, significantly improving upon the approximately 11% threshold achievable without two-way classical communication and the approximately 15% threshold obtained with only a single B-step. Our results show that two-way classical communication can substantially enhance the robustness of practical QCKA protocols.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum conference key agreement (QCKA) enables multiple users to establish a common secret key with information-theoretic security and is regarded as a key primitive for...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.