Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Networks
Quantum Simulation
Measurement Geometry as a Resource for Certifying Network Nonlocality
arXiv
Authors: Leon Adachi, Le Bin Ho
Year
2026
Paper ID
72418
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
171
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum networks can exhibit nonclassical correlations that cannot be explained by classical models with independent sources. While the role of entanglement is well understood, the impact of measurement design remains largely unexplored. Here we develop an operational framework for certifying network nonlocality in the bilocal Alice--Bob--Charlie network using ancilla-assisted meters to evaluate the nonlocal observables required for bilocal and fully network nonlocal (FNN) witnesses. The approach successfully reproduces both bilocal and FNN correlations in simulation. On the 156-qubit superconducting processor ibm_kingston, we observe bilocal nonlocality with mathcal{S}rm BLHV=1.067(6)>1 after readout-error mitigation, while the FNN witnesses reach 99\% and 96\% of their certification thresholds, implying the substantially stronger requirements for FNN certification. We further show that Bob's joint measurement determines the accessible level of network nonlocality: bilocal and FNN certification are optimized by different measurement settings, while both violations can disappear even for maximally entangled states. These results identify measurement geometry as an independent resource for network nonlocality and provide a practical route toward its certification on programmable quantum processors.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum networks can exhibit nonclassical correlations that cannot be explained by classical models with independent sources.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.