Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
Noise-limited secret key agreement with twin optical physically unclonable functions
arXiv
Authors: Georgios M. Nikolopoulos
Year
2026
Paper ID
72398
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
175
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We investigate the use of twin optical fingerprints derived from correlated physical unclonable functions (PUFs), as a hardware-based platform for cryptographic key generation and distribution. Each fingerprint is associated with a random, yet reproducible speckle pattern, generated when coherent light is scattered by a disordered optical structure. We consider a pair of correlated optical PUFs, and study the conditions under which two honest parties can establish a common secret key, despite fabrication-induced variability and environmental noise. An explicit information-theoretic key-agreement protocol is developed, incorporating secure sketches, error reconciliation, and privacy amplification. We quantify information leakage due to public helper data, and derive lower bounds on the length of the final secret key. The analysis identifies the noise regimes in which secure key agreement is feasible, and examines the performance of both practical and near-capacity reconciliation schemes. Finally, we discuss how twin optical PUFs could be integrated into quantum key distribution (QKD) networks, as a mechanism for establishing an initial pre-shared secret key between two honest users, without relying on computational assumptions or trusted third parties.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We investigate the use of twin optical fingerprints derived from correlated physical unclonable functions (PUFs), as a hardware-based platform for cryptographic key generation...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.