Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Networks
Fragile single-cone Dirac quantum walks in two dimensions
arXiv
Authors: C. W. J. Beenakker, J. Sánchez Férnan, J. Tworzydło
Year
2026
Paper ID
72385
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
108
Citations
N/A
Abstract
It is known that a one-dimensional (1D) quantum walk gives a local space-time discretization of the massless Dirac equation with a single quasi-energy cone (no fermion doubling at low energies), keeping the fundamental symmetries (chiral and time-reversal) of the continuum theory. We show that the analogous 2D construction is fundamentally more fragile. Local two-band quantum walks can have an unpaired Dirac cone, but the protecting symmetries then cease to be ordinary on-site symmetries: they become non-symmorphic, involving half-lattice translations, and are broken by generic spatial inhomogeneities. In particular, we demonstrate that the 2D Dirac quantum walk based on the Ho-Chalker network model can be gapped by potential scattering.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- It is known that a one-dimensional (1D) quantum walk gives a local space-time discretization of the massless Dirac equation with a single quasi-energy cone (no fermion doubling...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.