Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Simplified quantum key distribution implementation secure in the presence of state preparation flaws

arXiv
Authors: Ainhoa Agulleiro, Fadri Grünenfelder, Raphaël Houlmann, Ana Blázquez, Hugo Zbinden, Davide Rusca

Year

2026

Paper ID

72337

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

84

Citations

0

Abstract

We present an implementation of a three-state BB84 protocol with time-bin encoding, one decoy state and a simplified measurement scheme that uses passive basis choice. Our system simplifies the state characterization with respect to previous iterations. We also adapt the loss-tolerant method to our protocol, thus dealing with the measured state preparation flaws. We compare the obtained phase error rate and secret key rate when including the state imperfections and when assuming perfect states. Our results highlight the importance of characterization and implementation security.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We present an implementation of a three-state BB84 protocol with time-bin encoding, one decoy state and a simplified measurement scheme that uses passive basis choice.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #72337 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-21 01:08:57

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.