Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Control Protocols for Entangling Gates for Group-IV Color-Centers in Diamond

arXiv
Authors: Jurek Frey, Frank K. Wilhelm, Matthias M. Müller

Year

2026

Paper ID

72243

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

103

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Accurately controlling entangling gates remains a major challenge for quantum technology applications with solid-state spin qubits. Here, we study a group-IV color-center with a strongly-coupled nuclear spin and approach the problem from a quantum control perspective. We show that there are three different types of entangling gates where the entanglement is mediated by the parallel hyperfine-coupling component, the orthogonal one or both. We derive the respective quantum speed limits (QSL) and show by means of dynamical decoupling, resonant driving of single- and double-quantum transitions, quantum optimal control and algebraic gate decomposition how these gates can be realized. We finally discuss the experimental applicability.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Accurately controlling entangling gates remains a major challenge for quantum technology applications with solid-state spin qubits.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #72243 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.