Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Networks

(2,m)-threshold quantum data hiding

arXiv
Authors: Donghoon Ha, Jeong San Kim

Year

2026

Paper ID

72192

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

97

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We consider multiparty quantum state discrimination and present a multiparty quantum data-hiding scheme for one classical bit to be shared among multiple parties. In the proposed scheme, any pair of parties can collaborate to perfectly recover the hidden bit through a joint measurement, whereas measurements based on local operations and classical communication(LOCC) performed even by all parties reveal only an arbitrarily small amount of information. We further provide bounds on the optimal LOCC discrimination of multiparty quantum states. The proposed scheme can be implemented using only separable states of low-dimensional quantum systems, enhancing its practical feasibility.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Networks research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We consider multiparty quantum state discrimination and present a multiparty quantum data-hiding scheme for one classical bit to be shared among multiple parties.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #72192 #73048 A Non-Commutative Voronovskaya ... #73041 Comment on "Beyond-classical co... #73036 Keyless Covert Communication Ov... #73034 A Novel Parallel QCNN Architect...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.