!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Quantum computation as boundary stabilization in a mereotopological information model

Crossref
Authors: Adam Szmigielski

Year

2026

Paper ID

71940

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

79

Citations

0

Abstract

Abstract We introduce a structural representation of quantum computation in which quantum information is represented by boundary-supported components of the density matrix, while classical information corresponds to interior-supported, diagonal structure. Within this framework, quantum errors are identified with processes that increase effective boundary complexity, and quantum error correction corresponds to active stabilization of boundary-supported structure mediated by classical control. The approach provides a consistent geometric interpretation of noise, stabilization, and the quantum–classical transition within the standard quantum-mechanical formalism.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Abstract We introduce a structural representation of quantum computation in which quantum information is represented by boundary-supported components of the density matrix...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #71940 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-21 09:47:03

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.