Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Covariant measures of non-Markovianity in curved spacetime
Crossref
Authors: Tushar Waghmare
Year
2026
Paper ID
71663
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
189
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Abstract Standard diagnostics of quantum non-Markovianity are commonly formulated in terms of dynamical maps defined on a preferred time foliation. This becomes conceptually and operationally ambiguous in curved spacetime, where no global time coordinate exists and causal structure is primary. We develop a covariant framework for open quantum dynamics along arbitrary timelike worldlines by constructing multi-time processes (process tensors) from overlapping causal diamonds. For an Unruh–DeWitt detector weakly coupled to a scalar field in a Hadamard state, we quantify memory by the operational distance between the resulting process tensor and the convex set of Markovian (CP-divisible) combs, yielding a foliation-independent measure of non-Markovianity. Numerical benchmarks in ( 1 + 1 ) dimensions compare inertial and uniformly accelerated motion, as well as static and infalling trajectories in Schwarzschild spacetime. Inertial motion is nearly Markovian, whereas acceleration, curvature, and horizons generate long-range temporal correlations and strong multi-time memory, including an activation gap: effects that remain weak in single-step diagnostics become detectable and can be enhanced by genuinely multi-time protocols. Our results provide an operational route to quantifying quantum memory in relativistic settings and identify acceleration, curvature, and horizons as controllable ingredients for relativistic quantum-information tasks.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Abstract Standard diagnostics of quantum non-Markovianity are commonly formulated in terms of dynamical maps defined on a preferred time foliation.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.