Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Query and Depth Upper Bounds for Quantum Unitaries via Grover Search

Crossref
Authors: Gregory Rosenthal

Year

2026

Paper ID

71555

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

118

Citations

9

Abstract

We prove that any n -qubit unitary can be implemented (i) approximately in time O ~ ( 2 n / 2 ) with query access to an appropriate classical oracle, and also (ii) exactly by a circuit of depth O ~ ( 2 n / 2 ) with one- and two-qubit gates and 2 O ( n ) ancillae. The proofs involve similar reductions to Grover search. The proof of (ii) also involves a linear-depth construction of arbitrary quantum states using one- and two-qubit gates (in fact, this can be improved to constant depth with the addition of fanout and generalized Toffoli gates) which may be of independent interest. We also prove a matching Ω ( 2 n / 2 ) lower bound for (i) and (ii) for a certain class of implementations.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We prove that any n -qubit unitary can be implemented (i) approximately in time O ~ ( 2 n / 2 ) with query access to an appropriate classical oracle, and also (ii) exactly by a...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #71555 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-21 08:58:30

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.