Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Chemistry
Ground-state reachability for variational quantum eigensolvers: a Rydberg-atom case study
Crossref
Authors: Juhi Singh, Andreas Kruckenhauser, Rick van Bijnen, Robert Zeier
Year
2026
Paper ID
71470
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
149
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Abstract As quantum computing progresses, variational quantum eigensolvers (VQEs) for ground-state preparation have become an attractive option in leveraging current quantum hardware. However, a major challenge in implementing VQE is understanding whether a given quantum system can even reach the target ground state. In this work, we study reachability conditions for VQE by analyzing their inherent symmetries. We consider a Rydberg-atom quantum simulator with global controls and evaluate its ability to reach ground states for Ising and Heisenberg target Hamiltonians. Symmetry-based conclusions for a smaller number of qubits are corroborated by VQE simulations, demonstrating the reliability of our approach in predicting whether a given quantum architecture could successfully reach the ground state. Our framework also suggests approaches to overcome symmetry restrictions by adding additional quantum resources or choosing different initial states, offering practical guidance for implementing VQE in quantum simulation architectures. Finally, we illustrate connections to adiabatic state preparation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Abstract As quantum computing progresses, variational quantum eigensolvers (VQEs) for ground-state preparation have become an attractive option in leveraging current quantum...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.