Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

On a geometric interpretation of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> factor in black hole entropy

Crossref
Authors: Ira Wolfson

Year

2026

Paper ID

71121

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

76

Citations

0

Abstract

Abstract The Bekenstein–Hawking entropy S = A / 4 ℓ P 2 contains a coefficient 1 / 4 that has been calculated by many approaches to quantum gravity. We show that this factor arises from the causal geometry of any null boundary in a four-dimensional Lorentzian spacetime. A heuristic accessibility argument is supported by a purely geometric derivation using the canonical symplectic structure on the cotangent bundle and the causal splitting of the space of null rays. No gravitational field equations are invoked.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Abstract The Bekenstein–Hawking entropy S = A / 4 ℓ P 2 contains a coefficient 1 / 4 that has been calculated by many approaches to quantum gravity.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #71121 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-20 14:13:50

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.