Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Exact Hilbert-space ergodicity from continuous monitoring
arXiv
Authors: Yue Wu, Yuzhi Tong, Liang Mao, Pengfei Zhang
Year
2026
Paper ID
70529
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
177
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum evolution is generally expected to drive a quantum many-body system toward equilibrium. This expectation is often justified by the Hilbert-space ergodicity of generic quantum dynamics, namely, the idea that pure-state evolution explores Hilbert space uniformly up to physical constraints. Such a statement can be made rigorous by requiring the associated state ensemble to form the Haar-random ensemble, or its more structured generalization, the Scrooge ensemble. In this Letter, we report the emergence of exact Hilbert-space ergodicity in a continuously monitored quantum many-body system. For any target density matrix σ, we construct a continuously monitored system for which we rigorously prove that the Scrooge ensemble of σ is the unique late-time equilibrium distribution of quantum trajectories. Remarkably, this requires only that the jump operators in the monitoring form a deformed unitary 1-design, a seemingly much weaker condition than full ergodicity. We numerically demonstrate our predictions by simulating continuously monitored systems whose equilibrium states are thermal states. Our results establish a rigorous mechanism for the emergence of Hilbert-space ergodicity and provide a practical route for its investigation on quantum devices.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum evolution is generally expected to drive a quantum many-body system toward equilibrium.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.