Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Type IIB Axion--Dilaton Wormholes and the BPS Limit Hessian
arXiv
Authors: Soo-Jong Rey
Year
2026
Paper ID
70286
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
155
Citations
N/A
Abstract
I revisit Type-IIB axion--dilaton Euclidean saddles in a specified axion charge sector. In that sector, the solution with E=0 is the BPS instanton, while E>0 gives non-BPS wormholes with a smooth throat. The two cases solve the same radial equations but define different fluctuation problems. For the E=0 instanton, the Hamiltonian constraint, gauge quotient, charge-sector boundary condition, and removal of collective zero modes reduce the quadratic action to a physical Hessian. This Hessian factorizes, {cal H}_ν={mathcal Q}_νdagger{mathcal Q}_ν. I interpret this as an endpoint theorem, beyond a stability theorem for the full E>0 wormhole. This puts Type IIB wormhole spectra on firmer grounds. I also separate the connected two-ended wormhole throat from its long-distance two-end multipole operator term. Once the coefficient matrix Cij is derived, the different-component and same-component placements of the two end insertions are terms in the same quadratic expression. Removing either term requires a genuine projection or cancellation.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- I revisit Type-IIB axion--dilaton Euclidean saddles in a specified axion charge sector.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.