Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Foundations
One-shot quantum error correction of classical and quantum information
arXiv
Authors: Yoshifumi Nakata, Eyuri Wakakuwa, Hayata Yamasaki
Year
2020
Paper ID
7028
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
116
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum error correction (QEC) is one of the central concepts in quantum information science and also has wide applications in fundamental physics. The capacity theorems provide solid foundations of QEC. We here provide a general and highly applicable form of capacity theorem for both classical and quantum information, i.e., hybrid information, with assistance of a limited resource of entanglement in one-shot scenario, which covers broader situations than the existing ones. Harnessing the wide applicability of the theorem, we show that a demonstration of QEC by short random quantum circuits is feasible and that QEC is intrinsic in quantum chaotic systems. Our results bridge the progress in quantum information theory, near-future quantum technology, and fundamental physics.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum error correction (QEC) is one of the central concepts in quantum information science and also has wide applications in fundamental physics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.