Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Quantifying and Probing Multipartite Entanglement via Minimum Entanglement Drop
arXiv
Authors: Dong-Dong Dong, Xue-Ke Song, Liu Ye, Dong Wang
Year
2026
Paper ID
69921
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
172
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantifying genuine multipartite entanglement remains a significant challenge. We propose a multipartite entanglement monotone defined by the minimum entanglement drop - the reduction in global one-to-group entanglement upon tracing out a single particle. We formulate a computationally efficient variant using tangle and negativity to ensure non-vanishing values for W-class states, and rigorously prove it is a valid monotone under local operations and classical communication. In the tripartite regime, the minimum tangle drop is physically equivalent to the minimum pairwise concurrence. We establish an operational framework where the entanglement drop acts as a structural probe: by assessing sensitivity to qubit loss, it identifies inseparable clusters, extracting connectivity fingerprints that uniquely differentiate graph topologies within the same local Clifford equivalence class. Integrating this mapping with classical shadows enables efficient experimental estimation and dynamic tracking of entanglement network evolution. We derive exact analytical solutions for n-qubit W states under environmental noise, revealing robust scaling behaviors. Finally, we acknowledge limitations, noting that diagnostic sensitivity strictly vanishes for highly robust states such as the 5-qubit error-correcting code.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantifying genuine multipartite entanglement remains a significant challenge.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.