Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
A complexity theory for non-local quantum computation
arXiv
Authors: Andreas Bluhm, Simon H\"ofer, Alex May, Mikka Stasiuk, Philip Verduyn Lunel, Henry Yuen
Year
2026
Paper ID
69836
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
169
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Non-local quantum computation (NLQC) replaces a local interaction between two systems with a single round of communication and shared entanglement. Despite many partial results, it is known that a characterization of entanglement cost in at least certain NLQC tasks would imply significant breakthroughs in complexity theory. Here, we avoid these obstructions and take an indirect approach to understanding resource requirements in NLQC, which mimics the approach used by complexity theorists: we study the relative hardness of different NLQC tasks by identifying resource efficient reductions between them. Most significantly, we prove that f-measure and f-route, the two best studied NLQC tasks, are in fact equivalent under O(1) overhead reductions. This result simplifies many existing proofs in the literature and extends several new properties to f-measure. For instance, we obtain sub-exponential upper bounds on f-measure for all functions, and efficient protocols for functions in the complexity class mathsf{Mod}kmathsf{L}. Beyond this, we study a number of other examples of NLQC tasks and their relationships.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Non-local quantum computation (NLQC) replaces a local interaction between two systems with a single round of communication and shared entanglement.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.