Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
Mapping the non-equilibrium interacting Anderson Impurity Model to an effective Gaussian theory
arXiv
Authors: Emmanuel Bogacz, Graham Kells, Andrew K. Mitchell
Year
2026
Paper ID
69380
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
168
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum impurity models with strong electron correlations, such as the paradigmatic Anderson Impurity Model (AIM), are central to our understanding of a range of physical phenomena including local moment formation, Coulomb blockade and Kondo screening. They describe magnetic atoms and molecules on surfaces, quantum dot circuits, and correlated materials through dynamical mean field theory. The physics of such systems in strongly non-equilibrium conditions is particularly complex and challenging to capture, whereas Gaussian models of free fermions can be easily solved. Here we show that the time-evolving dynamics of the AIM after a quench can be described by a completely non-interacting version of the model, at the expense of coupling to additional static auxiliary degrees of freedom. Starting from the full solution of the quenched AIM using ED and DMRG, we study the properties of this mapping using numerical optimization, and uncover intriguing structure in the auxiliary system. The method allows us to understand interacting non-equilibrium dynamics through the simpler lens of an effective non-interacting system of larger dimension.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum impurity models with strong electron correlations, such as the paradigmatic Anderson Impurity Model (AIM), are central to our understanding of a range of physical...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.