Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Chemistry
Quantum-Classical Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo at the Edge of Practicability
arXiv
Authors: Francesco Nappi, Matthew Kiser, Fedor Å imkovic
Year
2026
Paper ID
69378
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
193
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We introduce algorithmic improvements to quantum-classical auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (QC-AFQMC) that reduce the dominant per-step classical scaling from {mathcal{O}}\(N5.5\) to {mathcal{O}}\(N4.5\) as a function of the number of molecular spin-orbitals N. Central to this improvement is the application of Aitken's block transformation to handle singular Pfaffians arising in the estimation of overlaps between a quantum trial state and classical Slater-determinant walkers. Together with the use of algorithmic differentiation for the computation of the force bias, this yields a 248times estimated runtime improvement for a system of 100 molecular orbitals. Using our workflow, we demonstrate a ground-state energy calculation for H8 from quantum data collected on IQM Emerald and post-processed with a tensor-network-based error-mitigation technique. We further validate the method's scalability through noiseless simulation of hydrogen chains up to H12, and on the lithium-air battery related rearrangement pathway of the Li2O4 lithium superoxide dimer in a (26e, 20o) active space. We estimate both quantum and classical runtimes for a potential fault-tolerant implementation of QC-AFQMC, showing that the method holds promise for the early fault-tolerant era. These results move QC-AFQMC a step closer to treating chemically relevant systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We introduce algorithmic improvements to quantum-classical auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (QC-AFQMC) that reduce the dominant per-step classical scaling from...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.