You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Complexity of detecting large coefficients in the Pauli basis
arXiv
Authors: Santiago Cifuentes
Year
2026
Paper ID
69358
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
182
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the problem of deciding, given a mechanism to prepare a quantum state ρ and a value varepsilon > 0, whether there is some non-identity Pauli matrix P such that |Tr(P ρ)| geq varepsilon. We consider that the state ρ is described as the result of tracing out some of the qubits of a pure state prepared by a circuit C, and we assume the promise that either there is a Pauli matrix satisfying the stated condition or, instead, that for all non-identity Pauli matrices P it is the case that |Tr(Pρ)|leq varepsilon/2. The problem is in QCMA, and we prove that if it belongs to BQP then NP subseteq BQP. The result is obtained through a reduction from the minimum-weight code problem, and it holds even when ρ is assumed to be a pure state (i.e. when no qubits are discarded) and varepsilon is constant. This resolves an open question regarding the existence of efficient tomographic procedures to find the largest coefficients of a quantum state in the Pauli basis: namely, they do not exist under the standard hypothesis NP nsubseteq BQP.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the problem of deciding, given a mechanism to prepare a quantum state ρ and a value varepsilon > 0, whether there is some non-identity Pauli matrix P such that |Tr(P...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.