Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Optimal Shadow Estimation with Minimal Measurement Settings
arXiv
Authors: Zhiyao Yang, Datong Chen, Huangjun Zhu
Year
2026
Paper ID
69335
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
155
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Shadow estimation is a powerful framework for predicting quantum properties from randomized measurements. While 3-design protocols achieve optimal worst-case performance, the minimal number of measurement bases required for such optimality has remained open. Here we prove that Θ\(d2\) measurement bases are both necessary and sufficient for worst-case optimal shadow estimation and construct an explicit basis family. In stark contrast, any state 2-design already suffices for average-case optimality: the mean squared shadow norm of normalized observables is bounded by a universal constant, and we prove strong concentration for Haar-random states, yielding constant sample complexity for generic pure-state fidelity estimation. Easily implementable 2-designs - from mutually unbiased bases, cyclic measurements, or shallow mathcal{O}\(log n\)-depth circuits - enable optimal average-case protocols with remarkably simple measurement strategies. Our results establish a fundamental complexity separation: worst-case estimation requires Θ\(d2\) bases, whereas average-case performance requires only Θ(d) bases, with broad implications for quantum information theory and near-term experiments.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Shadow estimation is a powerful framework for predicting quantum properties from randomized measurements.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.