Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Fast logic with slow qubits: microwave-activated controlled-Z gate on low-frequency fluxoniums
arXiv
Authors: Quentin Ficheux, Long B. Nguyen, Aaron Somoroff, Haonan Xiong, Konstantin N. Nesterov, Maxim G. Vavilov, Vladimir E. Manucharyan
Year
2020
Paper ID
6930
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
143
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We demonstrate a controlled-Z gate between capacitively coupled fluxonium qubits with transition frequencies 72.3 textrm{MHz} and 136.3 textrm{MHz}. The gate is activated by a 61.6 textrm{ns} long pulse at the frequency between non-computational transitions |10rangle - |20rangle and |11rangle - |21rangle, during which the qubits complete only 4 and 8 Larmor periods, respectively. The measured gate error of \(8pm1\)times 10-3 is limited by decoherence in the non-computational subspace, which will likely improve in the next generation devices. Although our qubits are about fifty times slower than transmons, the two-qubit gate is faster than microwave-activated gates on transmons, and the gate error is on par with the lowest reported. Architectural advantages of low-frequency fluxoniums include long qubit coherence time, weak hybridization in the computational subspace, suppressed residual ZZ-coupling rate here $46 kHz$, and absence of either excessive parameter matching or complex pulse shaping requirements.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We demonstrate a controlled-Z gate between capacitively coupled fluxonium qubits with transition frequencies 72.3 textrmMHz and 136.3 textrmMHz.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.