!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
GPU-accelerated semidefinite programming for causal games
arXiv
Authors: Emanuel-Cristian Boghiu, Kyrylo Simonov
Year
2026
Paper ID
69290
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
197
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The process matrix formalism describes quantum correlations in scenarios without a fixed causal order between local laboratories. Operational signatures of such correlations can be investigated through causal games. A paradigmatic example is the Guess-Your-Neighbour's-Input game, in which two parties attempt to guess each other's inputs. Correlations compatible with any definite, or probabilistically mixed, causal order cannot achieve a winning probability exceeding 1/2. The best process-matrix strategy currently known attains a value of approximately 0.6218 using local dimension d=5, while the strongest known dimension-independent upper bound is 0.7592. In this work, we investigate whether increasing the local dimension beyond d = 5 can narrow this gap. To this end, we employ a see-saw optimization scheme in which each step is formulated as a semidefinite program. For scalability, we develop a custom implementation of the SCS solver in which the dominant computational cost, the projection onto the positive-semidefinite cone, is offloaded to a GPU, yielding a six-fold speedup. Using this implementation, we explore local dimensions up to d = 8, and we do not find significant improvements over the value at d=5. Our results suggest that either qualitatively different strategies are required to approach the known upper bound, or that the bound itself is not tight.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The process matrix formalism describes quantum correlations in scenarios without a fixed causal order between local laboratories.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.