Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Quantum Thermodynamics
Relativistic strengthening of hydrogen bonds in bihalide anions: A four-component CCSD(T) study.
PubMed
Authors: Shitov DA, Kaplanskiy MV, Tupikina EY
Year
2026
Paper ID
69285
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
178
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this study, we systematically investigate relativistic effects in bihalide anions [XHX]- X = F, Cl, Br, I using four-component coupled-cluster calculations based on the Dirac-Coulomb Hamiltonian at the CCSD(T) level. Relativistic contributions are quantified by comparing results obtained with the four-component Dirac-Coulomb and Lévy-Leblond Hamiltonians, both combined with a Gaussian nuclear charge distribution model. Relativistic effects are intrinsic to molecular systems and can, in principle, modify hydrogen-bond strengths alongside solvation, nuclear quantum effects, and nuclear dynamics. We identify two distinct regimes of relativistic behavior for bihalide anions with light (F, Cl) and heavy (Br, I) halogen nuclei. Relativistic effects lead to a measurable enhancement of hydrogen bonding as reflected in rovibrational constants (vibrational frequencies and rotational constants), equilibrium geometries, thermodynamic parameters, and the electron-density distribution, in contrast to the known trend of relativistic weakening of covalent bonding in the neutral hydrogen halides HX X = F, Cl, Br, I. The maximum relativistic strengthening of the hydrogen bond is about 0.6-0.7 kcal/mol, while the relativistic localization of electron density in the internuclear region amounts to ∼0.1%-3.0%.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this study, we systematically investigate relativistic effects in bihalide anions [XHX]- X = F, Cl, Br, I using four-component coupled-cluster calculations based on the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.