Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Foundations
Hardy and Cabello Arguments in Spatial and Temporal Frauchiger-Renner Scenarios
arXiv
Authors: Ehsan Erfani Maharat, Ali Ahanj, Mohsen Sarbishaei
Year
2026
Paper ID
69238
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
139
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We investigate Hardy- and Cabello-type logical structures within spatial and temporal extensions of the Frauchiger--Renner (FR) framework, embedding these constructions directly into the FR multi-observer architecture. In the spatial multi-observer scenario, both Hardy and Cabello contradictions arise, with the Cabello construction yielding the stronger violation,\(Δrm Cabellomax=0.1078\), which exceeds the maximal Hardy probability \(PHmax=frac{5sqrt{5}-11}{2}approx 0.09017\). We then develop a sequential temporal FR protocol based on coherent multi-observer measurements performed on a single spin-tfrac12 system. In this temporal setting, the Hardy contradiction disappears identically due to dynamical constraints imposed by sequential state updates, whereas a finite Cabello-type violation survives, Δrm Cabellomaxapprox 0.0674. Our results establish a fundamental structural distinction between spatial entanglement and temporal multi-observer correlations in FR-type logical scenarios, and demonstrate that certain observer-independent description failures persist even without spacelike separation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We investigate Hardy- and Cabello-type logical structures within spatial and temporal extensions of the Frauchiger--Renner (FR) framework, embedding these constructions...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.