Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Degeneracy Cannot Violate the Quantum Hamming Bound
arXiv
Authors: Yu-Xuan Zhang, Jing-Ling Chen
Year
2026
Paper ID
69202
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
124
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The quantum Hamming bound is the standard finite-length sphere-packing bound for exact correction of arbitrary qubit errors. Whether degeneracy can evade this bound has remained unresolved in full generality for nearly three decades: distinct correctable errors may act identically on the code space, so the usual disjoint-sphere argument breaks down. We prove that every exact binary quantum subspace code with K>1 obeys the bound, without assuming either nondegeneracy or additivity. Our proof turns the Li--Xing linear-programming polynomial into an exact intersection count for quaternary Hamming balls. Monotonicity in block length and in ball-center separation then reduces the problem to a local node--edge charging inequality at the shortest admissible length. Thus degeneracy can merge correctable error sectors, but cannot enlarge the finite-length binary Hamming bound.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The quantum Hamming bound is the standard finite-length sphere-packing bound for exact correction of arbitrary qubit errors.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.