Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Light-tunable quantum metric non-linear Hall response in Berry dipole semimetals

arXiv
Authors: Debashree Chowdhury, Awadhesh Narayan

Year

2026

Paper ID

69019

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

97

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We investigate the effect of light on quantum metric-mediated intrinsic nonlinear Hall conductivity in Berry dipole semimetals. We discover that light induces a tunable asymmetry in the off-diagonal part of the quantum metric, which is manifested by an asymmetry in the quantum metric dipole. We show that the nonlinear response can be tuned directly by the light amplitude. In particular, we note that the direction of the nonlinear Hall signal changes when the light amplitude is increased beyond a threshold value. Light thus emerges as a promising stimulus to control the quantum geometric response in topological semimetals.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We investigate the effect of light on quantum metric-mediated intrinsic nonlinear Hall conductivity in Berry dipole semimetals.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #69019 #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.