Quick Navigation
Topics
Variational Hybrid Quantum Algorithms
Stronger Welch Bounds and Optimal Approximate k-Designs
arXiv
Authors: Riccardo Castellano, Dmitry Grinko, Sadra Boreiri, Nicolas Brunner, Jef Pauwels
Year
2026
Paper ID
689
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
193
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A fundamental question asks how uniformly finite sets of pure quantum states can be distributed in a Hilbert space. The Welch bounds address this question, and are saturated by k-designs, i.e. sets of states reproducing the k-th Haar moments. However, these bounds quickly become uninformative when the number of states is below that required for an exact k-design. We derive strengthened Welch-type inequalities that remain sharp in this regime by exploiting rank constraints from partial transposition and spectral properties of the partially transposed Haar moment operator. We prove that the deviation from the Welch bound captures the average-case approximation error, hence characterizing a natural notion of minimum achievable error at fixed cardinality. For k=3, we prove that SICs and complete MUB sets saturate our bounds, making them optimal approximate 3-designs of their cardinality. This leads a natural variational criterion to rule out the existence of a complete set MUBs, which we use to obtain numerical evidence against such set in dimension 6. As a key technical ingredient, we compute the complete spectrum of the partially transposed symmetric-subspace projector, including multiplicities and eigenvectors, which may find applications beyond the present work.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Variational & Hybrid Quantum Algorithms research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A fundamental question asks how uniformly finite sets of pure quantum states can be distributed in a Hilbert space.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.