Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Toward an Affordable Density-Based Measure for the Quality of a Coupled Cluster Calculation.
PubMed
Authors: Jones GH, Weflen KE, Martin JML
Year
2026
Paper ID
68551
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
133
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We propose two new diagnostics for the degree to which static correlation impacts the quality of a coupled cluster calculation. The first is the change in the Matito static correlation diagnostic between CCSD and CCSD(T), . The second is the ratio of the same and of the corresponding change in the total correlation diagnostic , i.e., . The first diagnostic can be extended to higher-order improvements in the wave function, e.g., . In general, a small [level] value indicates that at this level of theory, the density is converged and any further changes to the energy come from dynamical correlation, while larger [level] indicates that the density is still not converged at level and some static correlation remains. [()] is found to be a moderately good predictor for the importance of post-CCSD(T) correlation effects.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We propose two new diagnostics for the degree to which static correlation impacts the quality of a coupled cluster calculation.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.