Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Superposition in Measuring Apparatus: A Thought Experiment
arXiv
Authors: Vishwas KS
Year
2021
Paper ID
6846
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
160
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The measurement problem in quantum mechanics arises from the apparent collapse of a superposition state to a definite outcome when a measurement is made. Although treating the measuring apparatus as a classical system has been a successful approach in explaining quantum phenomena, it raises fundamental questions about the nature of measurement and the validity of wave function collapse. In this paper, we discuss a thought experiment that explores superposition in the measuring apparatus when it is treated as a quantum system. The experiment uses the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect in a two-photon interference setup, and its outcome is indicated by the coincidence count. Specifically, a zero count implies the existence of superposition, while a non-zero count indicates a wave function collapse. The discussions provide insight into the measurement problem, particularly regarding wave function collapse and nested measurement, and highlight the importance of indistinguishability to it. It provides a framework that probes the exact conditions necessary for a wave function collapse to happen.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The measurement problem in quantum mechanics arises from the apparent collapse of a superposition state to a definite outcome when a measurement is made.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.