Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Noise and Configuration Recovery Impact on Quantum Selected Configuration Interaction
arXiv
Authors: Nonia Vaquero-Sabater, Abel Carreras, Lukas Broers, Tomonori Shirakawa, Seiji Yunoki, David Casanova
Year
2026
Paper ID
68399
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
144
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum-selected configuration interaction (QSCI) is a promising hybrid quantum-classical approach in which a quantum device generates configurations for subsequent classical diagonalization. Here, we analyze the performance of QSCI combined with the local unitary cluster Jastrow (LUCJ) ansatz, focusing on the interplay between ansatz expressivity, sampling, noise, and configuration recovery. Using the dissociation of N2 in a large active space as a benchmark, we show that noiseless LUCJ sampling produces compact and biased configurational spaces, limiting the accuracy of the resulting CI energies, particularly in strongly correlated regimes. By introducing a simple noise model, we demonstrate that sampling noise can enhance Hilbert-space exploration by generating additional configurations beyond those supported by the ideal ansatz. When combined with configuration recovery, this leads to systematically improved energies. Moreover, recovery alone (starting from randomly generated configurations) can efficiently construct accurate CI spaces, highlighting its central role in QSCI.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum-selected configuration interaction (QSCI) is a promising hybrid quantum-classical approach in which a quantum device generates configurations for subsequent classical...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.