Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Foundations

Bell State Analysis Provides an Optimal Basis Saturating the Quantum Cramer-Rao in Rotation Sensing

arXiv
Authors: Zhuoran Bao, Daniel F. V. James

Year

2026

Paper ID

68382

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

104

Citations

0

Abstract

The second-order anti-coherent state of light is known to saturate the Cramer-Rao Bound (QCRB) for rotation sensing around an arbitrary axis. However, due to the complexity of the state and the inefficiency of state tomography, parameter extraction remains an open problem. In this manuscript, we approach the problem of parameter extraction using pair-wise Bell state analysis with an additional path degree of freedom. Due to the transformation property of rotation, only the symmetric Bell states will show up in projection in the final state. We exploit this advantage to develop a scheme for extracting the rotation angle for N=4 and N=6 second-order anti-coherent states.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The second-order anti-coherent state of light is known to saturate the Cramer-Rao Bound (QCRB) for rotation sensing around an arbitrary axis.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #68382 #68467 Hong-Ou-Mandel interference of ... #68417 Generalized Shift Vector as the... #68413 Emergent Operational Entangleme...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-11 06:18:34

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.