Quick Navigation

Topics

Topological Quantum Computing

Dirac-Line Criticality and Emergent Horizons in Weyl Lifshitz Transitions

arXiv
Authors: Iftekher S. Chowdhury, Hom Nath Dhungana, Shah Haque, Hind Adawi, Eric Howard

Year

2026

Paper ID

68309

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

124

Citations

0

Abstract

Type-II Weyl fermions may emerge behind the event horizon of black holes. We employ the Painlevé-Gullstrand metric to study the surface of the Lifshitz transition at the horizon, equivalent to the interface separating the type-I and type-II Weyl states. We find several analogies between the black hole horizon and the transformation of type-I to type-II Weyl fermions through the Dirac line. We analyze the symmetry-protected topological order at the Lifshitz transition originating in semimetals. The emergence of Hawking radiation in Weyl semimetals is discussed. We show that the transition state from type-I to type-II Dirac fermions can be viewed as a black-hole horizon, which exhibits unique characteristics, including a Dirac-line Fermi surface with a nontrivial topological invariant and a critical chiral anomaly effect.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Topological Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Type-II Weyl fermions may emerge behind the event horizon of black holes.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #68309

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-11 04:32:32

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.