Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Practical Tests and Witnesses of Fermionic non-Gaussianity
arXiv
Authors: Tobias Haug, Xhek Turkeshi, Piotr Sierant
Year
2026
Paper ID
68268
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
174
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Detecting when a quantum state leaves the efficiently simulable fermionic Gaussian regime is a central task for benchmarking quantum devices and certifying fermionic magic resources. We develop practical tests and witnesses based on fermionic antiflatness (FAF), a covariance-matrix-based measure of non-Gaussianity. For n-qubit states, we estimate FAF using two complementary protocols: two-copy Bell measurements and a single-copy scheme based on commuting matchings of Majorana bilinears. These yield testers that distinguish pure Gaussian states from states ε-far from the Gaussian set, using O\(n2/ε2\) two-copy Bell measurements or O\(n3/ε4\) single-copy measurements, improving the state of the art in the dependence on both n and ε. For mixed states, we introduce a purity-corrected FAF witness that certifies non-Gaussianity and is highly robust to noise. With our witness, we demonstrate on the IQM quantum computer that noise can both reduce and enhance non-Gaussianity. Finally, by examining pseudo non-Gaussianity, we show that the cryptographic task of pseudorandom-state generation requires extensive fermionic non-Gaussianity. Together, these results provide experimentally accessible tools for detecting, witnessing, and quantifying non-Gaussian fermionic resources.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Detecting when a quantum state leaves the efficiently simulable fermionic Gaussian regime is a central task for benchmarking quantum devices and certifying fermionic magic...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.