Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superradiant LIDAR
arXiv
Authors: T. Kullick, M. Bojer, J. von Zanthier, G. S. Agarwal
Year
2026
Paper ID
68176
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
137
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In recent years, light detection and ranging (LIDAR) has seen a steep rise in the sensitivity of measuring the distances of remote objects. Here, we propose to enhance the sensitivity of LIDAR even further by exploiting Dicke's concept of superradiance, i.e., the collective light emission of statistically independent light sources. By using N thermal light sources (TLS) and measuring intensity correlations of order m geq 2 instead of m=1, i.e., the intensity, we show that the Cramér-Rao bound on the measurement of the distance of a remote object undercuts that of traditional LIDAR by a factor of N, and can be reduced further with increasing correlation order m. Our numerical calculations are supported by analytical expressions for the special cases of two and three TLS and a general approximate expression for any number of TLS.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In recent years, light detection and ranging (LIDAR) has seen a steep rise in the sensitivity of measuring the distances of remote objects.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.