Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Phase separation seeded by Z2 and U(1) topological defects from holography
arXiv
Authors: Zi-Qiang Zhao, Zhang-Yu Nie, Jing-Fei Zhang, Xin Zhang
Year
2026
Paper ID
68081
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
121
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the interaction between spontaneous symmetry breaking and phase separation dynamics in holography. Using a double-quench protocol, the system first rapidly crosses the critical point and generates topological defects, while a second quench drives the system into a nonlinear unstable regime with spinodal decomposition. We investigate both mathbb{Z}2 and U(1) symmetric systems, where different types of topological defects emerge during symmetry breaking. We show that topological defects dynamically determine the nucleation sites of phase separation. As the instability grows, the defect cores expand into macroscopic phase-separated domains. Despite the distinct symmetries and topological properties of these defects, both systems exhibit the same universal dynamical behavior, indicating that topological defects can universally serve as dynamical seeds for subsequent phase separation.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the interaction between spontaneous symmetry breaking and phase separation dynamics in holography.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.