Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Correlated Quantum Sensing at the Seemingly Classical Limit
arXiv
Authors: K. P. Athulya, Sreenath K. Manikandan
Year
2026
Paper ID
68006
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
153
Citations
N/A
Abstract
It is a difficult task to detect the indivisible quanta of weakly interacting radiation fields, and even more challenging to probe their quantum statistics. Nevertheless, if barely functional high-quality resonant detectors are feasible for weakly interacting radiation fields, they do come with certain statistical advantages to probe quantum effects at the seemingly classical limit of a large number of quanta of the incoming radiation field. We present correlated counting, homodyne, and heterodyne detection strategies using high-quality resonant quantum harmonic detectors operating at this limit, initialized in bolometry-inspired zero-mean preparations such as thermal states. We compare the bolometric regime of good resonant harmonic detectors in quantum optics to the bolometric regime of barely functional resonant mass quadrupole oscillators as detectors for quantum gravity. Simple statistical tests are proposed using symmetric correlators for two and three such barely functional resonant mass detectors that could reveal the complementary quantum noise characteristics of gravitons in tabletop experiments.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- It is a difficult task to detect the indivisible quanta of weakly interacting radiation fields, and even more challenging to probe their quantum statistics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.