Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Penalty-free quantum optimization applied to lattice protein folding
arXiv
Authors: Leif Gellersen, Anders Irbäck, Lucas Knuthson, Stefan Prestel
Year
2026
Paper ID
67985
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
173
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Identifying minimum-energy structures of lattice proteins is a challenging discrete optimization problem. Quantum approaches such as analog quantum annealing and the gate-based quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) can address this problem after mapping it to a binary representation, which typically involves introducing penalty terms to enforce valid chain configurations. However, in this and many related problems, the use of quadratic penalty terms can be avoided by restricting the search space to independent sets in a conflict graph and using a QAOA mixer designed for the maximum independent set problem. In this work, we implement and explore this QAOA variant for lattice protein folding. Here, the objective function consists solely of the protein energy together with a simple linear bias term, without quadratic penalties. We validate this approach through classical simulations of the quantum circuits for lattice proteins of lengths N=4 and N=6. To explore larger systems, we further introduce a heuristic iterative local-search scheme, with which we successfully fold lattice proteins with lengths up to N=14 using local subgraphs with at most 26 qubits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Identifying minimum-energy structures of lattice proteins is a challenging discrete optimization problem.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.