Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Practical Limits on Integrated Squeezers
arXiv
Authors: Devin J. Dean, Taewon Park, Lars S. Madsen, Alex Terrasson, Sam Robison, Geun Ho Ahn, Ziyu Wang, Hubert S. Stokowski, Luke Qi, Jesse J. Slim, Joel Corney, Darwin Serkland, Warwick P. Bowen, Martin M. Fejer, Amir H. Safavi-Naeini
Year
2026
Paper ID
67980
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
82
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Recent experiments have demonstrated the successful generation and detection of moderately squeezed vacuum states with integrated photonics. However, in order to benefit from the reduced noise of highly squeezed light, many different noise sources must be mitigated. Here, we quantify the fundamental limits these noise sources impose on squeezing measurements and find surprising generality across different platforms and designs. We combine these different limitations into a simple model that provides practical guidance for the design and benchmarking of next-generation integrated squeezed-light systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Recent experiments have demonstrated the successful generation and detection of moderately squeezed vacuum states with integrated photonics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.