Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Graphical and algebraic methods for Boolean factoring
arXiv
Authors: Simon Martiel, Priyanka Mukhopadhyay
Year
2026
Paper ID
67952
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
184
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The problem of factoring Boolean polynomials has significant applications in both classical and quantum computing technology. In this paper we have developed novel algorithms for factoring both ESOP and SOP expressions. Our aim is to optimize the AND-count. The AND-count plays a key role in determining the number of AND and Toffoli gates required to implement a reversible function with classical and quantum circuits, respectively. The first type of algorithms that we develop, are graphical. We reduce the problem of Boolean factoring to covering a bipartite graph with bicliques, and so optimizing the number of bicliques required to cover the bipartite graph, leads to reduced number of factors, and hence AND-count. The second type of algorithm is algebraic, and is derived from multivariate Horner method. We have compared the performances of our algorithms with existing popular methods like EXORCISM-4 and EPOEM2, on random functions of up to 12 variables. We have observed that our multivariate Horner method is substantially faster, while our biclique-based method achieves the maximum AND-count reduction. In fact, compared to EXORCISM-4 our biclique based method achieves up to 5 times reduction in AND-count.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The problem of factoring Boolean polynomials has significant applications in both classical and quantum computing technology.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.