Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Foundations

Leggett-Garg test inequality with spin and flavour neutrino oscillations in a constant magnetic field

arXiv
Authors: I. A. Monroy, S. D. Madrid

Year

2026

Paper ID

67883

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

100

Citations

0

Abstract

The Leggett-Garg inequality (LGI), an analogue of Bellś inequality involving correlations of measurements of one observable on a system at different times, stands as one of the hallmark tests of quantum mechanics against classical predictions. In this work, we investigate its implications in the context of neutrino flavour eLleftrightarrowν_μL$ and spin eLleftrightarrowνeR$ oscillations in the presence of a constant transverse magnetic field. For systems with strong magnetic fields, we show that, for both cases, there are length regions ΔL where the LGI is violated, as quantified by the correlator functions K3 and K4.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The Leggett-Garg inequality (LGI), an analogue of Bellś inequality involving correlations of measurements of one observable on a system at different times, stands as one of the...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #67883 #68467 Hong-Ou-Mandel interference of ... #68417 Generalized Shift Vector as the... #68413 Emergent Operational Entangleme...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-11 21:35:18

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.