Quick Navigation
Topics
Topological Quantum Computing
Probing PbTe-Pb nanowire devices with radio-frequency reflectometry
arXiv
Authors: Xin-Yi Tang, Lin Li, Zezhou Xia, Jierong Huo, Wenyu Song, Lining Yang, Zonglin Li, Jiaye Xu, Peilin Li, Runan Shang, Qi-Kun Xue, Ke He, Hao Zhang
Year
2026
Paper ID
67878
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
90
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We report the implementation of radio-frequency (rf) reflectometry on selective-area-grown PbTe-Pb nanowire devices on a CdTe substrate. These nanowires were predicted to host Majorana zero modes. We demonstrate the compatibility of the rf technique, both resistive and capacitive sensing, with these nanowires. The effect of dielectric loss from the CdTe substrate is also discussed. The feasibility of rf reflectometry is also verified at finite magnetic fields where zero-energy modes occur. Our results enable the fast control of PbTe quantum devices, paving the way for its application in topological quantum computation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Topological Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We report the implementation of radio-frequency (rf) reflectometry on selective-area-grown PbTe-Pb nanowire devices on a CdTe substrate.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.