Quick Navigation
Topics
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
Highly Selective Separation of Hydrogen Isotopes via the Construction of Ionic-Bonded Organic Frameworks.
PubMed
Authors: Wang J, Gai D, Yuan C, Deng W, Han Y, He Q, Li J, Chen J, Yu W, Zou X, Qiu H
Year
2026
Paper ID
67723
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
147
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Separation of hydrogen isotopes is a great challenge due to the almost identical physicochemical properties of the two isotopes. Recently, crystalline organic frameworks have demonstrated the potential to separate hydrogen isotopes by kinetic quantum sieving, but the synthesis of porous frameworks with ultrafine pores remains a significant challenge for D/H separation. In this work, ionic-bonded organic frameworks (IOFs) were synthesized using tetraphenylethylene (TPE)-based multidentate imidazolium cations and sulfonic anions as self-building blocks via a cation-π interaction-assisted strategy to construct ionic-bonding directionality. This structural formation mechanism is obviously different from the previously reported hydrogen-bonding-assisted and sterically induced ionic orientation of crystalline porous organic salts. These synthesized IOFs, which exhibit distinct pores and high surface areas, have great potential as quantum sieves for the separation of hydrogen isotopes (H and D), as evidenced by an unprecedented high D/H selectivity of 12.7 via the kinetic quantum sieving effect.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Separation of hydrogen isotopes is a great challenge due to the almost identical physicochemical properties of the two isotopes.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.