Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Deterministic Mapping of Topological Phases via Autoregressive Exogenous Neural Networks
arXiv
Authors: Graciana Puentes
Year
2026
Paper ID
67425
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
190
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We report a comparative analysis of three dynamic neural network (NN) architectures - NAR, NARX, and NIO - to evaluate their efficiency in estimating the critical-measurement-strength parameter $ccrit$ characterizing topological phase transitions in geometric phases induced by weak measurements. Our results demonstrate that the NARX architecture achieves superior predictive fidelity, reaching a Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 10-27 - the limit of numerical precision - at an optimal delay of d=1. This exceptional performance implies the identification of a perfect functional identity, suggesting that the relationship between winding numbers W and ccrit is mathematically deterministic. We observe a "complexity paradox" where the NARX model's accuracy collapses at higher delays $d=4$, a phase-sensitivity that confirms the model captures a high-precision dynamic mapping rather than a trivial pattern. While the NAR model remains robust for local-trend capture, the NIO architecture fails to accurately resolve the phase transition despite increased neuronal capacity. These findings underscore that both autoregressive feedback and immediate exogenous context are essential for the exact characterization of topological phases, establishing NARX as a robust framework for deriving governing laws in complex quantum systems, where analytical solutions remain elusive.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We report a comparative analysis of three dynamic neural network (NN) architectures - NAR, NARX, and NIO - to evaluate their efficiency in estimating the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.