Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation

Detecting Errors in a Quantum Network with Pauli Checks

arXiv
Authors: Alvin Gonzales, Daniel Dilley, Bikun Li, Liang Jiang, Zain H. Saleem

Year

2024

Paper ID

67335

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

120

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We apply the quantum error detection scheme Pauli check sandwiching (PCS) to quantum networks by turning it into a distributed multiparty protocol. PCS provides protection on the targeted qubits and generally requires less resource overhead than standard quantum error correction and detection codes. We provide analytical equations for the final fidelity and postselection rate for different PCS checks. We also introduce a recursive version of PCS that generates a family of distance 2 quantum codes that are locally equivalent to Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) codes. Our analytical results are benchmarked against the Bennet-Brassard-Popescu-Schumacher-Smolin-Wooters (BBPSSW) protocol in comparable scenarios. We also perform simulations with noisy gates for entanglement swapping and attain fidelity improvements. Lastly, we discuss various setups and graph state properties of PCS.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #67335 #67351 Quantum-assisted Rendezvous on ... #67337 Parameterization and optimizabi... #67330 Multi-qubit quantum state prepa... #67329 Quantum-centric strong and dyna...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.