Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Fast adiabatic preparation of multi-squeezed states by jumping along the path

arXiv
Authors: Chuan Chen, Jian-Yu Lu, Xu-Yang Chen, Zhen-Yu Wang

Year

2024

Paper ID

67320

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

105

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Multi-squeezed states, also known as generalized squeezed states, are valuable quantum non-Gaussian resources, because they can feature non-classical properties such as large phase-space Wigner negativities. In this work, we introduce a novel shortcuts to adiabaticity (STA) method for the fast preparation of multi-squeezed states. In contrast to previous STA methods, which rely on the use of counterdiabatic control to suppress unwanted non-adiabatic effects, our method simplifies the process and accelerates state preparation by selecting an appropriate sampling along a quantum evolution path. We demonstrate the high-fidelity and fast preparation of multi-squeezed states, as well as hybrid entangled states between a bosonic mode and a qubit.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Multi-squeezed states, also known as generalized squeezed states, are valuable quantum non-Gaussian resources, because they can feature non-classical properties such as large...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #67320

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.