Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Adaptable Weighted Token Swapping Algorithm for Optimal Multi-Qubit Pathfinding
arXiv
Authors: Gary J Mooney
Year
2024
Paper ID
67172
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
195
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum computing promises breakthroughs in simulating and solving complex, classically intractable problems. However, current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices are relatively small and error-prone, prohibiting large-scale computations. To achieve quantum advantage in this regime, it is crucial to minimise the impact of noise from qubit decoherence and two-qubit gates. A direct approach is to optimise quantum circuit compilation, particularly by improving how circuits are mapped onto hardware. This work targets multi-qubit pathfinding (MQPF), a key subproblem in quantum circuit mapping, formulated as a variant of the token swapping problem. We propose an adaptable algorithm, modelled as a binary integer linear program, that routes K teams of qubits on hardware graphs using swap operations. The algorithm minimises SWAP-gate depth and accumulated gate and idle errors, effectively solving a weighted version of the parallel (K+1)-coloured token swapping problem. We benchmark performance across various hardware layouts, comparing runtimes, SWAP depths, gate counts, and errors. Our results show that the proposed MQPF algorithm offers significantly improved runtime scaling and lower accumulated errors over a state-of-the-art exact SMT-CBS-based method. Potential applications include precomputing optimal routing for circuit mappers, benchmarking heuristics, and informing quantum hardware design by analysing pathfinding behaviour.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum computing promises breakthroughs in simulating and solving complex, classically intractable problems.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.