Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Rearrangement of single atoms in a 2000-site optical tweezers array at cryogenic temperatures
arXiv
Authors: Grégoire Pichard, Desiree Lim, Etienne Bloch, Julien Vaneecloo, Lilian Bourachot, Gert-Jan Both, Guillaume Mériaux, Sylvain Dutartre, Richard Hostein, Julien Paris, Bruno Ximenez, Adrien Signoles, Antoine Browaeys, Thierry Lahaye, Davide Dreon
Year
2024
Paper ID
67138
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
107
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We report on the trapping of single rubidium atoms in large arrays of optical tweezers comprising up to 2088 sites in a cryogenic environment at 6 K. Our approach relies on the use of microscope objectives that are in-vacuum but at room temperature, in combination with windowless thermal shields into which the objectives are protruding to ensure a cryogenic environment for the trapped atoms. To achieve enough optical power for efficient trapping, we combine two lasers at slightly different wavelengths. We discuss the performance and limitations of our design. Finally, we demonstrate atom-by-atom rearrangement of an 828-atom target array using moving optical tweezers controlled by a field-programmable gate array.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We report on the trapping of single rubidium atoms in large arrays of optical tweezers comprising up to 2088 sites in a cryogenic environment at 6 K.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.