Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Optimization

Eclipse Qrisp QAOA: description and preliminary comparison with Qiskit counterparts

arXiv
Authors: Eneko Osaba, Matic Petrič, Izaskun Oregi, Raphael Seidel, Alejandra Ruiz, Sebastian Bock, Michail-Alexandros Kourtis

Year

2024

Paper ID

67104

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

102

Citations

N/A

Abstract

This paper focuses on the presentation and evaluation of the high-level quantum programming language Eclipse Qrisp. The presented framework, used for developing and compiling quantum algorithms, is measured in terms of efficiency for its implementation of the Quantum Approximation Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) Module. We measure this efficiency and compare it against two alternative QAOA algorithm implementations using IBM's Qiskit toolkit. The evaluation process has been carried out over a benchmark composed of 15 instances of the well-known Maximum Cut Problem. Through this preliminary experimentation, Eclipse Qrisp demonstrated promising results, outperforming both versions of its counterparts in terms of results quality and circuit complexity.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • This paper focuses on the presentation and evaluation of the high-level quantum programming language Eclipse Qrisp.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #67104 #69549 REGRID-QAOA: A Resource-Efficie... #69528 QALM: Escaping Local Minima via...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.